Structured adversarial analysis for plaintiff attorneys in expert-dependent civil litigation
Expert reports are not evaluated on the quality of their reasoning.
They are evaluated on how authoritative they sound.
This book is about the gap between those two things, what creates it, what sustains it, and how to close it before it costs a case.
26 chapters. Readable in a single sitting.
Questions or have a report to discuss:
raymond@causationreview.com
causationreview.com